16
Wishlist / Feature Requests / Re: Compatibility with additional/custom tags on Smart Views
« on: April 26, 2018, 11:55:29 AM »
Hi,
I would be very interested in this feature, it's something that I've been thinking of for a while. Here's another use case: add a "featuring" field. For example, in the Queen's album Hot Space, most tracks have only Queen as Interpret, except for Under Pressure, which features David Bowie. If the Interpret field is Queen feat. David Bowie, it messes with the album grouping, which means the Album Interpret has to be used. Using a Featuring field for storing David Bowie would make more sense.
And does this feature implies that title formatting would also need to be redone? Would make sense.
About the feasibility, could this be a way to go: Let the user specify which fields he needs, which defines the library metadata, and if there's a change in this metadata, have the library rebuild itself. I guess this rebuild would be quite difficult to implement, and very CPU consuming, but maybe it's feasible...
Benco
I would be very interested in this feature, it's something that I've been thinking of for a while. Here's another use case: add a "featuring" field. For example, in the Queen's album Hot Space, most tracks have only Queen as Interpret, except for Under Pressure, which features David Bowie. If the Interpret field is Queen feat. David Bowie, it messes with the album grouping, which means the Album Interpret has to be used. Using a Featuring field for storing David Bowie would make more sense.
And does this feature implies that title formatting would also need to be redone? Would make sense.
About the feasibility, could this be a way to go: Let the user specify which fields he needs, which defines the library metadata, and if there's a change in this metadata, have the library rebuild itself. I guess this rebuild would be quite difficult to implement, and very CPU consuming, but maybe it's feasible...
Benco